Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(battery_plus): Support Swift Package Manager #3154

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

koji-1009
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add SPM support.

https://docs.flutter.dev/packages-and-plugins/swift-package-manager/for-plugin-authors

I also noticed an error in the documentation.
Since we need to refer to the documentation when reviewing PRs, it will be draft until the next PR is reviewed.

flutter/website#11020


As a working test, I have confirmed that it can be built with flutter 3.24 + CocoaPods, and that it can be built with flutter main channel + SPM.
Note that if you try building with main channel + SPM, you will need to remove some steps from your iOS project, as the script to add Pods is no longer needed.

Related Issues

Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I titled the PR using Conventional Commits.
  • I did not modify the CHANGELOG.md nor the plugin version in pubspec.yaml files.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • The analyzer (flutter analyze) does not report any problems on my PR.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require plugin users to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • Yes, this is a breaking change (please indicate that with a ! in the title as explained in Conventional Commits).
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

@koji-1009 koji-1009 force-pushed the feat/spm_battery branch 3 times, most recently from 59ed5b4 to 9ba32e4 Compare August 10, 2024 02:38
@koji-1009
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would be happy to include flutter/website PR and feel free to review it. There is no need to rush and we would like to discuss how it should be implemented.

@koji-1009 koji-1009 marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2024 05:23
Copy link
Contributor

@charafau charafau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @koji-1009 ! thanks for contribution. I ran pod lint on macos projects and get few warnings:

➜  battery_plus pod lib lint macos/battery_plus.podspec  --configuration=Debug --skip-tests --use-modular-headers

 -> battery_plus (0.0.1)
    - WARN  | license: Missing license type.
    - WARN  | [OSX] keys: Missing primary key for `source` attribute. The acceptable ones are: `git, hg, http, svn`.
    - NOTE  | xcodebuild:  note: Using codesigning identity override:
    - NOTE  | [OSX] xcodebuild:  note: Building targets in dependency order
    - NOTE  | [OSX] xcodebuild:  note: Target dependency graph (4 targets)
    - NOTE  | [OSX] xcodebuild:  note: Metadata extraction skipped. No AppIntents.framework dependency found. (in target 'battery_plus' from project 'Pods')
    - NOTE  | [OSX] xcodebuild:  note: Metadata extraction skipped. No AppIntents.framework dependency found. (in target 'App' from project 'App')

[!] battery_plus did not pass validation, due to 2 warnings (but you can use `--allow-warnings` to ignore them).
You can use the `--no-clean` option to inspect any issue.
➜  battery_plus pod lib lint macos/battery_plus.podspec  --configuration=Debug --skip-tests --use-modular-headers --use-libraries


 -> battery_plus (0.0.1)
    - WARN  | license: Missing license type.
    - WARN  | [OSX] keys: Missing primary key for `source` attribute. The acceptable ones are: `git, hg, http, svn`.
    - NOTE  | xcodebuild:  note: Using codesigning identity override:
    - NOTE  | [OSX] xcodebuild:  note: Building targets in dependency order
    - NOTE  | [OSX] xcodebuild:  note: Target dependency graph (4 targets)
    - NOTE  | [OSX] xcodebuild:  note: Metadata extraction skipped. No AppIntents.framework dependency found. (in target 'App' from project 'App')

[!] battery_plus did not pass validation, due to 2 warnings (but you can use `--allow-warnings` to ignore them).
You can use the `--no-clean` option to inspect any issue.

not sure if they were there before but it would be nice to fix it

Copy link
Contributor

@charafau charafau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry, I think that warning were there before, so let's leave it as it is. Probably fix for different PR.

lgtm

@koji-1009
Copy link
Contributor Author

The contents of the ios/ directory will not be uploaded to https://cocoapods.org/. So pod spec lint shows multiple problems, but I don't see any major issues.
I'm sure time will solve the problem in the future once the migration from CocoaPods to SPM is complete.

Copy link
Member

@miquelbeltran miquelbeltran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I still want to test this on my devices before merge.

@miquelbeltran miquelbeltran added battery_plus Battery Plus Plugin and removed PR: needs review labels Aug 12, 2024
resources: []
)
]
)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: add new line here

s.dependency 'Flutter'

s.platform = :ios, '12.0'
s.pod_target_xcconfig = { 'DEFINES_MODULE' => 'YES' }
s.resource_bundles = {'batery_plus_privacy' => ['PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy']}
s.resource_bundles = {'batery_plus_privacy' => ['battery_plus/Sources/battery_plus/PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy']}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should batery be battery here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants